Assistant Director
Federal
Research and Development
Office of
Science and Technology Policy, The White House
How did you get involved with JASC and how do you feel about your experience?
I got involved with JASC when I was an undergrad
at Boston University. One of my professors who did research on Japanese
education told me about it and said I should think about applying. So I did. I
was excited to go, and that was the 42nd JASC. liked it so much I signed up with the AEC
for the 43rd, so I ended up going twice. Those JASCs were
life-changing in many ways, in that it gave me a clear idea of what I wanted to
do immediately after college, which is, to spend time in Japan. I lived in Japan for a year and a half after
the 43rd JASC while working and figuring out what I wanted to do
after that in my life.
I taught English while there, and
did a couple of research projects to prepare for graduate school. It was the
first time I’d lived in Japan, even though most of my family is there. It was interesting being able to experience
a part of Japan through the JASC, outside family circles. I had wanted to experience Japan as an
independent adult for a while, and through JASC it worked out. At the time, when I was thinking
about graduate school, the experience of JASC and then living in Japan made me
want to study in an International Relations program. That’s what I applied for, and then went to GW’s Elliott
School of International Affairs. I
could have pursued a couple of different majors, economics, political science, or a
more general public policy degree, but I think the reason that I chose the
International Relations degree was because of the JASC experience. In that sense, JASC got me started, and then along the way I
took a detour into science and technology policy within the degree program. That is what I’m doing now. When I was with American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), I was responsible for helping
to organize annual meetings of science and technology policymakers, and
certainly being an AEC, trying to help put together a JASC is something I
looked back on. Being an AEC impacted
my ability to bring together a group of people from different countries and get
them to talk productively about issues. I haven’t been in touch with many fellow alumni and that is unfortunate. I’ve come to the reunions and a couple of receptions over the years
because I’m only a few blocks away and the JASCs tend to come through DC. I guess I should mention that one follow-up that I did have to JASC is that the last time JASC was in DC, I was
able to work out a field trip to the National Institute for Health (NIH) for one of the study sessions, what do you call it now? Roundtables! That was a great intersection of AAAS and JASC, because I was
able to go with them on this day to NIH where we were able to talk about
biomedical research, and also international scientific cooperation. Do you have and advice or anecdotes to share?
On my first JASC, clearly the
most memorable part was the Alaska trip, because it was so sort of outside the
experience of the American side, much less the Japanese side, to spend a week
in the middle of summer in Anchorage and points even farther out. I remember things like when the school buses
were rumbling through not very well-paved roads, and it just being summer and
the sun not going down until 11, and wandering around in the middle of the night
when you can still see each other. But on
the Japan trip, the 43rd JASC, one of the things that stood
out as a negative was that there ended up being a lot of tension within the JEC,
which we got mixed up in, exactly how much involvement the Japanese delegates
had in planning, organizing, setting up the Conference (as opposed to the
JEC). I remember that as being
something to watch out for, for the AEC or JEC not to promise too much in the
way of participation, saying that these decisions have to be made long before
the students get there, and it’s really hard to change plans in
mid-stream. That was the one mess that,
if I were doing JASC, again I would have tried to do
better, to clearly delineate what a JEC does, and what kind of input or
agenda-setting power the other students will have. And please don’t do a ferry ride between Honshu and
Hokkaido again. That was awful. It was an experience I’ll always remember,
but not as positively as the midnight sun in Alaska. Being on this boat, where a lot of people got sick, and also,
we’re just stuck on a boat for 19 hours. It was from Niigata to Hokkaido, so it’s not just across that little
straight, it was further down Honshu. That was a low-budget compromise: we had to do the cheapest thing. That was the cheapest way to get there, and
also to get in one night’s sleep. Over time, JASC has become a
really pleasant memory, especially my first one, maybe because it was the
first one for me. Maybe also because
something just seemed to gel with the 42nd JASC, perhaps, it was a
sense that we were all learning about, first of all, Alaska, also, for some
reason there was this camaraderie that emerged despite the odds, and that year
the AEC had lost three to four members throughout the year. So last-minute replacements were brought in,
they were scouring past JASCs, as well as one or two people who hadn’t been on
a previous JASC. That was an
interesting challenge, and also there’s the challenge of putting something
together in Alaska. And yet, we all had
great interactions. Less so the one in
Japan, To this day I’m not really sure why that didn’t go as well. Maybe we didn’t do a good enough job as AEC.
We didn’t have it as together, although I think we selected a great delegation. Right now, I’m trying to implement the Obama administration agenda for science and
technology. The new technology czar
will be my in office, which will also have some responsibility for cyber security. What I work on
most now is the Federal Budget, and I’ve been working pretty closely with the
Office of Management and Budget within the Office of the President, and with
other agencies, making sure we have some good, solid budgets going forward. We
want to move the United States forward on some of these big challenges, like
energy, climate change, healthcare reform. On the policy front, we’re very optimistic. We’re off to a great start.
|